 |
Houses
cater to Bowdoin boozers
During this week's discussion forum, students tried to develop
ideas for improving the College House System. While such efforts are commendable,
it is unlikely that the House System will improve unless action is taken
regarding the place of alcohol in Bowdoin's social structure.
While hard alcohol and "drinking games" are not allowed on
campus, each weekend, the College-funded Houses host parties which provide
kegs of beer to students. Yet the vast majority of party attendees are
First-years and sophomores who are not of legal drinking age.
House parties are heavily marketed towards under-class students
since they have limited alternatives for drinking-few of them are 21 and
are thus excluded from Brunswick's hopping bar scene and find it difficult
to otherwise procure alcohol.
The upper-class students who have viable entertainment alternatives
often choose activities other than the College House parties. Perhaps
the most obvious reason for this phenomenon is that House parties offer
those over the age of 21 a poor value; the parties offer free, albeit
low-quality beer, and little else. Why should anyone attend an event that
begins at 10:00 p.m. and ends at midnight when they could instead spend
an entire evening with friends?
In addition to this flaw, many upper-class students feel
daunted by the House System since so few of their classmates attend these
parties. The only solution to this problem is to make social events more
palatable to those over 21, rather than host parties that are essentially
meat markets centered on a finite quantity of cheap keg beer.
While changes to the House System will not be easy, they
are necessary to provide, as stated in the Student Handbook's section
on drugs and alcohol, "an environment in which students can further their
own intellectual, social, moral, and physical development and in which
all members of the campus community can work together in pursuit of knowledge
and understanding."
We wish the leaders of the House System luck in this quest,
both for the selfish reason of improving social life now, and for the
more grandiose goal of improving the inter-class dialogue and creating
a more unified and vibrant Bowdoin.
|
 |
|