 |
Controversial
newspaper ad provokes protests
by
JAMES FISHER, SENIOR COPY EDITOR
A newspaper advertisement designed to both apologize
for the social effects of slavery and argue against government-funded
reparations to black Americans has ignited firestorms of controversy in
many colleges across the country.
The advertisement was sent to some college newspapers,
although it bypassed the newspapers of most liberal arts schools, including
Bowdoin. Although the advertisement has generally been met with a good
deal of debate, at some colleges, the advertisement has arrived and departed
very quietly.
The advertisement is a list of ten reasons "why reparations
for slavery are a bad idea for black people--and racist too." It was written
and submitted by conservative columnist David Horowitz, who offered up
to $800 to 59 major college newspapers, including those at Florida State,
Columbia, the University of Virginia, Brown, and the University of Illinois,
to print the ad.
By Horowitz's count, 35 papers chose not to run the
ad, 14 printed it, and 10 are still deciding. The advertising blitz was
focused on daily newspapers with a relatively large circulation in urban
areas; most liberal arts college newspapers, including The Orient,
have not been asked to sell space for it, although the Dartmouth Daily
received and declined to accept Horowitz's list.
Horowitz is not a stranger to political controversy
following him to campus. In the 1960s, he edited a radical left-wing journal,
Ramparts. Throughout the 1970s, Horowitz made a well-documented
journey to the opposite side of the political spectrum.
In a column written a few months ago, Horowitz wrote
about "the ugly iceberg of paranoia and hate that the political left--beginning
with Al Gore and Jesse Jackson and going on to Patrick Leahy and Ted Kennedy--has
recently planted in America's political heart."
"Rhetorically," Salon columnist Alicia Montgomery
says, "Horowitz has much more in common with rabble-rouser Al Sharpton
than he cares to admit."
Horowitz's rhetoric is famous for its grittiness, and
it is his tone, not simply his ideas, that causes such a stir on campuses.
When he spoke at Berkeley last month, he shared the stage with 30 armed
campus police and two personal bodyguards.
At the University of Wisconsin, the editors of the Badger-Herald,
which printed the ad on February 28, confronted 100 of their readers storming
the editorial offices demanding an apology for the decision.
A spokesperson for Wisconsin's Multicultural Students
Coalition accused the newspaper as well as Horowitz of "exercising their
racism, their power to institutionalize their racism."
At Brown, newspapers containing the ad were removed
by students and replaced with flyers objecting to the paper's decision
to run it.
Those protests have generated additional controversy
on campuses regarding freedom of the press. Horowitz has compared the
student protesters at Brown and Wisconsin to Nazi brownshirts, reminding
readers that "the Nazis took over universities first."
Some editors, too, are responding forcefully to accusations
of racism and thefts of entire print runs by angry students. After all
but 100 issues of the Brown Herald were destroyed by student protesters,
the paper declared that "we will not apologize for printing a legitimate
advertisement that may offend some of our readership" and labeled the
theft of the print run "an unacceptable attempt to silence our voice."
This week, as students at the University of North Carolina
marched to protest the ad, Bowdoin remained unaffected by the controversy.
The issue of reparations for slavery has not been the subject of any recent
lectures or presentations here, said professors in the Africana Studies
and Government departments.
A new book in favor of reparations by Randall Robinson
entitled The Debt: What America Owes To Blacks has been ordered
by, but not yet delivered to, Hawthorne-Longfellow Library.
And the Orient--along with weeklies at most small
liberal arts colleges--has, so far, been left alone.
|
 |
|