 |
A
Sympathetic Reaction is not Enough
In bringing Dr. Gail Dines to campus this past week, Safe
Space performed a great service to the Bowdoin community. Most people
did not agree with everything Dines said, and some people agreed with
nothing she said. However, for the first time in a long time, there was
standing room only in Kresge Auditorium, and not for a concert or play,
but for a lecture addressing the issue of violence against women.
Although the general Bowdoin population is tolerant of groups
such as Safe Space, the Bowdoin Women's Association, and WARRIORS, it
is rare that students move beyond a general recognition of an issue to
question the origins of such problems. When a student publicly shares
his or her experience of surviving sexual assault or abuse, or some other
type of socially influenced trauma, a collective sympathy is usually expressed
by most of the student body. However, such sympathy is rarely translated
into self-reflection or an actual deconstruction of the issue.
In attending Dines's lecture, students were forced not only
to acknowledge that yes, violence against women is bad, but they were
challenged to think about why then, such a problem persists. Maybe Dines
doesn't have all of the answers, or at least the correct ones, but she
offered plenty of evidence which suggests there is an urgent need to begin
critically thinking about the way in which our individual actions reinforce
the culture at large, and thus, the persistence of sexual and physical
violence against both women and men.
If the student body cannot, or will not, acknowledge and
work to eliminate sexual violence at Bowdoin, then there is nothing exceptional,
smart, or prestigious about this institution. If you degrade or threaten
women, treat them as sexual objects, or if you chastise or attack men
who challenge such behavior, you have no place at Bowdoin.
Why are members of the student body so hesitant to make such
definitive statements? Perhaps out of fears-the fear of social alienation,
ruining one's reputation or romantic prospects or fears of being verbally
or physically attacked. After all, Bowdoin is a small place, and working
for change, especially radical change, can be a lonely endeavor if most
of the campus is unwilling to participate, regardless of their beliefs.
However, just because people seem to accept or even thrive
on the dominant culture, does not mean this is the case. Too may students
wonder why, if they are adhering to the prescribed gender norms and sexual
conduct of the dominant Bowdoin culture, they feel so bad while everyone
else appears so content. But when the keg runs dry and students find themselves
in a state of sober solitude, the memory of last night's hook-up, sexual
or emotional mistreatment, or mere witness of degrading or violent behavior,
causes most students to feel anything but content.
|
 |
|