![]() |
||
|
|
||
Bowdoin needs some traditions of its own In the first months of my freshman year, I refused to walk through the
gate that stands between the Quad and College Street. I was under the
erroneous impression that it was a college tradition not to walk through
that gate until one had graduated. Midway through my first year, upon
noticing numerous people walking through the gate, I realized that this
was a tradition of Princeton and not Bowdoin. I recounted this story in the dining hall one night last week. My friends
were lamenting that there were no traditions of that sort at the College.
We compared Bowdoin to other schools whose customs are more embedded in
student life. Princeton has its gate, and Washington and Lee has a barn
where Robert E. Lee's horse is buried. My dining companions and I theorized that perhaps our dearth of traditions
is a consequence of the decision to end fraternities. I'm sure that fraternities
added something to the traditions, but as social houses become a more
cemented presence in college life, we won't know the difference between
the Chi Delta Flag football tournament and the Quinby rendition. However, this conversation made me think about the place of tradition
in our broader society. Tradition seems to have taken a bad name recently.
One tends to associate it with elements of superiority, exclusion, elitism,
etc.. These are not complimentary associations in today's sensitive culture.
This brings to mind two examples of tradition or its representation being
squashed in the name of "fairness" or "equality."
The first took place around Christmastime when the city council of Kensington,
Maryland voted to ban Santa Claus from the town's Christmas tree lighting
ceremony. Apparently, two citizens complained that people might be offended
by the religious presence at a civic ceremony. Last month, the borough president of Brooklyn decided to take down the
portraits of George Washington and other famous framers from the borough
office. He objected to our great leaders's artistic presence because they
held slaves and were all white; apparently the singularity of skin color
did not adequately "represent" all of Brooklyn's residents. Both instances are representative of something that has occurred often
in recent memory. Long-standing traditions are being shelved because certain
groups of people feel excluded or marginalized. What bothers me about
this trend, both locally and nationally, is that it ignores the positive
virtues to be gained from a tradition-laden experience. Enacting a tradition is a way of connecting with the past. It grounds
the participant in the history, meaning, and lore of a particular institution.
As National Review Senior Editor Jeffrey Hart said in an article about
the Wimbledon tennis tournament, the All England Club's mandation of white
clothing is a "subordination of the individual, and
of the ego." Traditions also reinforce other positive values. In the two aforementioned
cases, the controversial symbols represented more than an affront to extreme
secular and racial agendas. Santa Claus, or St. Nicholas, epitomizes charity,
unity, family, etc. None of these virtues are uniquely Christian; rather,
one can find them in a lot of faiths. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, etc. may have held slaves in a period
when it was socially acceptable, but they and many other American framers
also recognized slavery's injustices and hoped that the Nation would rectify
it. These men established the system under which Abraham Lincoln could
lead the fight toward emancipation. These are the celebratory and reflective messages that traditional symbols
should embody. They allow us to actively look into the past, just as traditional
actions permit us to connect with those who have come before us. It is perhaps this desire to participate in activities that transcend
ourselves that keeps us attending the Bowdoin/Colby hockey game in hoards.
We see that there is indeed something redeemable about unfettered enthusiasm
for one's school. Even if it is just an annual occasion, we see ourselves
as part of the long storied past of Bowdoin. Nobody complains that the
cheers could be offensive to Colby fans. If only our leaders were as enlightened as those raucous hockey fans, the living gates of history represented by long-standing traditions would be opened to anyone willing to walk through them. |
||