![]() |
||
|
|
||
A need for practical classes It's not new or uncommon to complain about limited course offerings.
Every student and faculty member will give a different reason about why
the curriculum is flawed. The complaint in this short discussion is that too many Bowdoin classes
are simply not useful. Students have been complaining about the un-usefulness
of classes for quite a while, as far back as the 1800s, when colleges
only offered a prescribed classical education, and students were tired
of learning ancient languages and literatures. Now we're tired of classes
that teach us how to theorize but never how to do. The increasingly popular software training classes offered by CIS offer
something that Bowdoin classes rarely offer: practicality. Even though
they're short, one-time courses, they're a welcome addition to a curriculum
that not only de-emphasizes practicality but generally derides it and
fears it as well. Other than the CIS classes, the only place to formally learn useful,
practical things tends to be outside of the classroom. Students can get
a hands-on, practical education at Bowdoin, but this occurs almost exclusively
in student employment or student activities-such as the Orient, Masque
and Gown, WBOR, BCN, and so on. Perhaps this is the way many want it to be, but then we must ask, why?
There are a number of practical classes offered now, mostly in the education,
art, music, and theater departments. And practical classes have been offered
in various other disciplines from time to time-a look at old College Catalogues
shows courses such as electronic film production, public speaking, and
technical theater. Being liberally educated is a good thing, and we don't propose that Bowdoin offer degrees in business or journalism or communications. However, it would greatly benefit us to have a few practical classes in these and other areas that would teach us things that we might actually remember and be able to use somewhere other than in the classroom. -NJL |
||