![]() |
||
|
|
||
Tyranny of the good At a lecture held Tuesday entitled "The Tyranny of
the Positive Attitude in America," Barry N. Wish Professor of Psychology
and Social Studies Barbara Held discussed the exponential growth of the
self-help industry in turn-of-the century America and the overwhelming
push for a positive attitude that underlies it. Professor Held reacted
to this trend in saying that it can cause more perils than promise for
many people. The talk was given to the Jung Seminar as an encore presentation
she gave to the Friends of Bowdoin in October. According to Held, the tyranny lies in the pervasive attitude
that we must remain positive at all times and at all costs. It is found
in our most common aphorisms, including "Cheer up! Things could be
worse," "Stop complaining, it's not that bad," and "Smile,
look on the bright side," and in that ubiquitous yellow smiley face
that adorns T-shirts and bumpers from coast to coast. But the tyranny
of the positive attitude is most present in self-help books based on some
form of positive thinking. "Most of the books which make sweeping claims to change
people's lives dramatically for the better have not been put to any systematic
empirical test," says Held. "Moreover, if the advice given in
these books really worked," she adds, "why do we have so many?" Held invited listeners to simply look on the shelves at
bookstores. Self-help books that continue to sell well include Norman
Vincent Peale's "The Power of Positive Thinking" and Dale Carnegie's
"How to Win Friends and Influence People." The self-help industry
reportedly makes 2.48 billion dollars every year, according to Newsweek
Magazine. Held also said there are costs of accentuating the positive
and eliminating the negative, as many of these books tell readers to do,
so that the tyranny of the positive attitude may work paradoxically to
lower our sense of well-being. Some of the costs include feeling guilty
or defective when you can't be happy or feel good. "I am not against
optimism, hope, or being positive," says Held. "When being positive
works for you, be positive, but we should not be forced to be positive." Professor Held is the author of "Stop Smiling, Start
Kvetching: A 5-Step Guide to Creative Complaining," published in
2001. Kvetching is a Yiddish term referring to venting, and should not
be mistaken for whining. Creative kvetching involves expressing to a willing
listener the inevitable pain of living. The tyranny of the positive attitude manifests itself not
only in popular culture, but also in the positive psychology movement
that has emerged in the psychology profession. "I am not saying there
is no role for therapists," says Held, "but some people would
not need therapists if more people would listen empathically. Would there
be such a demand for professional empathy if we had more empathic listeners
in our everyday lives?" Held also used cross-cultural studies of the US and Japan
to support her argument. "In the US," she says, "a sense
of subjective well-being is linked to self-esteem and an inflated view
of oneself. In Japan, however, a capacity for self-criticism is what gives
people a sense of well-being." Therefore, achieving a sense of happiness
by way of seeing yourself in positive terms is not universal. Held referred to Wellesley Professor Julie Norem, author
of "The Positive Power of Negative Thinking," who uses defensive
pessimism as her own preferred coping strategy. Held says defensive pessimists
set unrealistically low expectations for their performance on a task,
think of everything that could go wrong, and then think about ways of
avoiding those pitfalls. This is a strategic option that works for some
people by lowering debilitating anxiety. "People should be allowed to use the coping strategy
that works for them," concludes Held. In reaction to Norem's claim
that "One size does not fit all," Held simply responds: "Why
should it?" Professor Held is a licensed clinical psychologist who has been teaching at Bowdoin College since 1979. She is also the author of "Back to Reality: A Critique of Postmodern Theory in Psychotherapy." |
||