|
|
||
Changing Lanes speeds by competition The thing that distinguishes a good thriller from a bad
one is humanity. Plain and simple. If you don't know or particularly care
enough about the characters or their struggles, you get Panic Room,
the subject of last week's review, which got boring when something wasn't
exploding or Jodi Foster wasn't running. If you do, however, you get gems
like Changing Lanes, a thriller that, thankfully, got it right.
There was an appeal to human issues here that reached beyond the scope
of the amazing car crash scenes and skilled cinematography; the stories
and struggles of the two protagonists became more thrilling than the visual
spectacles the genre usually relies on. The adrenalin takes the back seat
while the story drives you along-that's the way to ride a thriller. Changing Lanes tells the story of how bad luck on the freeway
throws two men on a path of escalating destruction for over 36 hours.
On a day when both lawyer Gavin Banek (Ben Affleck) and recovering alcoholic
Doyle Gibson (Samuel L. Jackson) had to be in court, they have an accident
on the FDR after which Gibson is tragically late to a custody hearing
and Banek realizes he left a crucial file at the scene. So begins a disastrous
day-long feud that throws their lives into turmoil and forces them to
revaluate where they're heading. This is Roger Michell's second film of note, after he directed the acclaimed
Notting Hill in 1999. If this is an experimental dip into a different
genre, he certainly succeeded on his first try. Not only that, he managed
to help Ben Affleck regain the respect he lost after such atrocities as
Pearl Harbor and Bounce. Here, Ben sweats and paces just
like a real lawyer-so close to the real thing I'd almost say he should
change careers
but actually, this is the best acting we've seen
from him to date-Gavin changes during the course of the film as he realizes
that he has been succumbing to the corruption of his profession, and Ben
brilliantly shows the pain associated with that kind of self-evaluation.
As for Samuel, there really is nothing he can't do; he succeeds in portraying
Gibson both violently and with sympathy for his softer side so that we
understand his struggles and root him on. The most remarkable thing about this movie is the characters. Somehow,
we feel connected to every last one of them-down to Gibson's bank teller.
But it's the two protagonists that offer the biggest portion of the human
condition. Though dramatically different, their ultimate goals are the
same: to find what it is to live right and follow it. I don't mean to undermine the thrilling aspects of the film by going off about its story. The plotline is both humanly understandable and completely unpredictable-the perfect ingredients for suspense that only the best thrillers can provide. Entertainment and enlightenment-the two are rarely seen together during the dry season in Hollywood. Take advantage of this little oasis. You'll be very glad you did. |
||