|
|
||
Research diversion: the case of the egg As I was looking through microfilms of The London Times
the other day for a research project, I came across the following article
from November of 1936. ******
Shopkeeper's Offence
An egg was the subject of a long legal argument between a solicitor appearing
for the London County Council and Mr. Frank Powell, the magistrate, at
Greenwich Police Court yesterday, when a Sydenham shopkeeper was summoned
for serving an egg after 8 p.m.
******
In the end the solicitor won his case, and the shopkeeper paid a fine. Somewhere else in the microfilms from the same year I found an account of a trial for poisoning, in which a man confessed to having sent a gift of poisoned tarts to another man, and insisted that the poisoned man's wife had had nothing to do with it. This raised two questions in my mind: first, why send several poisoned tarts to one person? Wouldn't one do the trick? Second, if the wife was innocent, how did she know not to eat the remaining tarts, or let anyone else eat them? |
||