|
|
|||
Policy should protect human rights To the Editors: Much of the discussion about the "potential war"
in Iraq has ignored the human rights issues at stake. Yes, Saddam Hussein
has committed gross violations of human rights against his own people.
However, a US led war would only serve to exacerbate the dire human rights
situation in the country. While the work of a few human rights organizations
has been used to justify the use of military force as a means for ousting
Saddam Hussein, it has been done in a context that is rhetorical and manipulative.
The debate must be extended to consider the serious effects that military
action would have on the civilian population of Iraq. Further, the destruction of civilian infrastructure incurred by a U.S. bombing campaign will have serious effects on the Iraqi people. Public health officials warn that targeting electricity grids that power water treatment and sewage plants as planned, would lead to water contamination and widespread disease. Moreover, if the U.S. bombs government food facilities (as it did in 1991 in Iraq and 2001 in Afghanistan), the 60% of Iraqis who are dependent on food rations will face hunger and starvation. If we are serious about a commitment to human rights, then without wavering in our condemnation of the policies and tactics of Saddam Hussein and his government, we must seek a foreign policy that protects the human rights of all people. War is not the answer. Sincerely, Deborah Wissel '03
|
|||