The Bowdoin Orient

Volume CXXXIX, Number 8
 November 6, 2009


News

Scientific American price hike sparks protest

Scientific American Magazine, the library's most widely-read publication, is under fire.

The magazine recently announced that it will be raising its prices from $39.95 to $299 for an annual print subscription and from $1,000 to $1,500 for annual online access in 2010.

This increase is part of a larger trend that is being met with formal protest from many college libraries, including Hawthorne-Longfellow Library (H-L Library).

"The library community perceived that it was so clearly related to greed and there was no prior notice. There was no notice at all," said Librarian Sherrie Bergman.

Despite attempts to contact Scientific American, they declined to comment on their reason for increasing the cost of subscriptions.

Scientific American is a magazine, rather than a peer-reviewed journal. It synthesizes scientific discoveries and explains them in a way that is aimed at an educated, yet inexpert audience.

The Magazine's relatively informal yet informative articles make it one of Bowdoin professors' favorite publications to assign to students.

"The one title that is read more than any other is Scientific American," said Bergman.

While other publications have also raised their costs, Bergman said Scientific American's price hike was "the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back."

In response to the price increase, Bergman was one of 50 library directors to sign a recent letter addressed to the Scientific American's parent company, Nature Publishing Group.

The letter, which was sent in October, was organized by the Oberlin Library Group, an organization of college libraries dedicated to the Open Access Movement. The movement was established in order to protest the high price of modern scientific journals.

"The point was to issue a voice of protest," said Bergman.

As part of this movement, the H-L Library recently took part in "International Open Access Week," between October 19 and 23, described by Science Librarian Sue O'Dell as "a growing international movement that encourages the unrestricted sharing of research results over the internet with everyone, everywhere."

While both O'Dell and Bergman were quick to add that they were aware of the costs associated with the production of such a journal, they stated that their goal is to pressure publishers to lower prices to more reasonable levels.

"This movement would not have started if journals were fairly priced," said Bergman.

While Scientific American is not expensive when compared to some other journals that the library subscribes to, which, according to Bergman, can cost between five to fifteen thousand dollars a year, the increase in Scientific American's prices feels like a betrayal.

For Bergman, the timing of the change in cost contributed to this sentiment: the announcement of the increased prices in Scientific American prices came only weeks after Nature Publishing Group bought the company.

"Their price increase was so clearly related to their company being sold...and there was no added value that the libraries were going to receive," said Bergman.

The increase in price was also unexpected because Scientific American did not take the usual course of announcing the possibility of raising its costs at an earlier date.

Instead, the magazine only stated that it would be making the change when it had already been finalized.

The change was announced just as H-L Library was compiling its annual budget, and while Bergman says that the price increase will not lead to any real changes in the library's proposed budget, many college libraries have been forced to end their subscription to the popular magazine.

Annually, the Bowdoin library spends $1,039,447 for periodicals, including Scientific American.

The complaints of those frustrated with the high prices of scientific journals have recently found voice in the United States Senate, where Connecticut Senators Joseph Lieberman and Texas Senator John Cornyn introduced the Federal Research Public Access Act in June.

If passed, the act would mandate that pre-reviewed drafts of all studies funded by Federal money be made available at no cost to the public.


Comments

There are no comments for this article yet.

You must have a Bowdoin login in order to comment. If you do not, there are a number of other ways to contact us.
Questions or suggestions concerning comments? E-mail orient@bowdoin.edu with the subject line "Comments."


In the current Orient

EDITORIAL

Ongoing Evaluations

This week, the Orient investigated the little-known process of Ongoing Learning Evaluations (OLEs), during which professors invite honest student ... Read

NEWS

ED I apps projected to rise by five percent

Though the total is still being tallied, the number of Early Decision I (ED I) applications appears to be up from last year. As of yesterday, the ... Read

FEATURES

Bowdoin EcoReps work to reduce unnecessary waste

As part of Maine Recycles Week, enthusiastic student volunteers worked alongside Sustainable Bowdoin student EcoReps to collect, weigh and sort trash ... Read

OPINION

We need more nuclear plants to combat global warming

If we have so many diplomatic problems with the Middle East, why do we send them millions of dollars a day by purchasing their oil? Everyone across ... Read

ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT

Student-directed play ‘Rhinoceros’ challenges conformity

The star of Bowdoin's newest show could trample you. Masque and Gown, in collaboration with the Department of Theater and Dance, opened its fall ... Read

SPORTS

Football comes back against Colby to claim share of CBB Title

In a game played through a steady rain, the Bowdoin Polar Bears wrapped up a season that began with so much ... Read


Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
Copyright © 2009, The Bowdoin Orient